▦ FDB4
// Elo ratings 545,856 matches rated · 14,934 teams
Strength, and what it says about draws

How strong is a team, and how often do equals draw?

Every match in the database is replayed in date order. Both sides start at 1500; the winner takes points from the loser, more when the result was a surprise and more again when the margin was wide. A team's rating is therefore what its results have earned, and the gap between two ratings before kick-off is a measure of how uneven the match should be. The tables below show how often each size of gap ended level.

Matches rated545,856
Teams rated14,934
Evenly matched draw 27.39% gap under 25
Mismatch draw 13.96% gap 300+
Descriptive statistics, not betting advice → read this
Clubs: how often each rating gap drew 496,175 matches
Clubs: how often each rating gap drew 0% 15% 30% drew 0–24 — bookmaker's figure 28.79% 0–24 — drew 27.39% 27.4% 0–24 25–49 — bookmaker's figure 28.66% 25–49 — drew 26.31% 26.3% 25–49 50–74 — bookmaker's figure 28.34% 50–74 — drew 25.02% 25.0% 50–74 75–99 — bookmaker's figure 27.91% 75–99 — drew 25.21% 25.2% 75–99 100–149 — bookmaker's figure 26.93% 100–149 — drew 25.26% 25.3% 100–149 150–199 — bookmaker's figure 25.26% 150–199 — drew 23.72% 23.7% 150–199 200–299 — bookmaker's figure 22.31% 200–299 — drew 20.55% 20.6% 200–299 300+ — bookmaker's figure 16.00% 300+ — drew 13.96% 14.0% 300+ rating gap before kick-off
drew bookmaker's figure How often each rating gap actually drew, beside the draw chance the closing odds implied.
Rating gap Matches Drew Bookmaker's figure Return if you bet every draw
0–24 67,269 27.39% 28.79% -1.08%
25–49 72,945 26.31% 28.66% -3.14%
50–74 79,128 25.02% 28.34% -2.77%
75–99 64,786 25.21% 27.91% -2.60%
100–149 86,885 25.26% 26.93% -3.11%
150–199 53,211 23.72% 25.26% -2.52%
200–299 49,450 20.55% 22.31% -5.79%
300+ 22,501 13.96% 16.00% -12.49%

Evenly matched sides draw far more often than mismatched ones — the first row against the last is the whole story. The last three columns compare that with the betting market on the matches that carry a price: the bookmaker's figure tracks reality closely, and betting every draw loses money in every row. "Drew" and "Drew (those)" differ because priced matches are top divisions, which draw slightly more often.

National teams: how often each rating gap drew 49,681 matches
National teams: how often each rating gap drew 0% 15% 30% drew 0–24 — drew 27.50% 27.5% 0–24 25–49 — drew 25.37% 25.4% 25–49 50–74 — drew 26.90% 26.9% 50–74 75–99 — drew 25.86% 25.9% 75–99 100–149 — drew 24.58% 24.6% 100–149 150–199 — drew 23.11% 23.1% 150–199 200–299 — drew 19.92% 19.9% 200–299 300+ — drew 12.37% 12.4% 300+ rating gap before kick-off
drew How often each rating gap actually drew.
Rating gap Matches Drew Bookmaker's figure Return if you bet every draw
0–24 5,179 27.50% — —
25–49 5,077 25.37% — —
50–74 5,115 26.90% — —
75–99 4,618 25.86% — —
100–149 8,299 24.58% — —
150–199 6,447 23.11% — —
200–299 8,423 19.92% — —
300+ 6,523 12.37% — —
Top clubs by current rating
# Team Rating Peak
1 FC Bayern München 2,307 2,328
2 Manchester City 2,267 2,331
3 Arsenal 2,248 2,293
4 Barcelona 2,212 2,243
5 Paris Saint-Germain 2,155 2,231
6 Real Madrid 2,143 2,237
7 Inter Milan 2,130 2,202
8 FK Bodø/Glimt 2,124 2,143
9 Brighton & Hove Albion 2,113 2,113
10 Liverpool 2,085 2,285
11 Borussia Dortmund 2,084 2,116
12 Viking FK 2,083 2,097
13 Aston Villa 2,075 2,162
14 Brentford 2,070 2,070
15 Sporting CP 2,064 2,145
16 Bayer Leverkusen 2,063 2,190
17 Manchester United 2,060 2,147
18 Atlético Madrid 2,049 2,134
19 Bournemouth 2,041 2,073
20 Chelsea 2,039 2,185
21 SL Benfica 2,028 2,071
22 VfB Stuttgart 2,027 2,050
23 Leeds United 2,026 2,033
24 AS Roma 2,025 2,070
25 Porto 2,016 2,086
26 Zenit Saint Petersburg 2,010 2,011
27 Royale Union Saint-Gilloise 2,009 2,037
28 Everton 2,002 2,009
29 Newcastle United 1,993 2,141
30 Juventus 1,992 2,200
Top national teams by current rating
# Team Rating Peak
1 Spain 2,312 2,312
2 England 2,195 2,195
3 Argentina 2,190 2,200
4 France 2,157 2,210
5 Portugal 2,087 2,088
6 Morocco 2,075 2,106
7 Brazil 2,039 2,212
8 Colombia 2,033 2,115
9 Switzerland 2,033 2,033
10 Japan 2,026 2,064
11 Netherlands 2,023 2,177
12 Belgium 2,018 2,175
13 Norway 1,973 2,053
14 Germany 1,965 2,254
15 Mexico 1,965 2,054
16 Italy 1,957 2,095
17 Nigeria 1,949 1,962
18 Australia 1,936 2,002
19 Senegal 1,924 1,991
20 Croatia 1,923 2,036
21 United States 1,923 2,011
22 Ecuador 1,919 1,980
23 Austria 1,917 1,957
24 Algeria 1,911 1,961
25 Uruguay 1,909 2,056
26 Denmark 1,909 2,018
27 Paraguay 1,905 1,905
28 South Korea 1,901 1,986
29 Iran 1,900 2,017
30 Canada 1,878 2,010
All rated teams 14,934 teams
Clear
▸ Reset
# Team Rating Peak
14701 ToTe/Arabia 1,416 1,500
14702 Marsaxlokk 1,416 1,500
14703 Gaz Metan Mediaș 1,415 1,694
14704 1. FC Kaiserslautern II 1,415 1,583
14705 SG Sonnenhof Großaspach 1,415 1,534
14706 TSV 1860 Rosenheim 1,414 1,513
14707 Ponnistus/Peruskallio 1,414 1,500
14708 Bangor City 1,414 1,500
14709 Lorca 1,414 1,626
14710 Central African Republic 1,413 1,557
14711 Hansa Rostock II 1,412 1,500
14712 Cowdenbeath 1,412 1,548
14713 VfL Bochum II 1,412 1,531
14714 VfB Lübeck 1,412 1,556
14715 LUIF 1,412 1,500
14716 VfR Aalen 1,411 1,604
14717 Clyde 1,411 1,693
14718 Louhans-Cuiseaux 1,411 1,505
14719 Hoverla Uzhhorod 1,411 1,524
14720 RSV Eintracht 1949 1,410 1,502
14721 Vanspor FK 1,410 1,526
14722 Málaga CF B 1,410 1,515
14723 US Savoia 1908 1,410 1,512
14724 Mika-2 1,410 1,500
14725 Castel di Sangro 1,410 1,550
14726 UE Sant Julià 1,410 1,500
14727 Northampton Town 1,409 1,664
14728 Sporting Kansas City 1,409 1,666
14729 Congo 1,409 1,675
14730 Sicula Leonzio 1,409 1,503
14731 SV Seligenporten 1,407 1,500
14732 Araks Ararat 1,407 1,740
14733 SP Domagnano 1,407 1,500
14734 Liaoning 1,407 1,592
14735 Dagenham & Redbridge 1,407 1,598
14736 Čelik Nikšić 1,406 1,503
14737 Shrewsbury Town 1,406 1,685
14738 Santos Laguna 1,405 1,642
14739 Droylsden 1,405 1,500
14740 Żurrieq 1,405 1,500
14741 Maidstone United 1,404 1,537
14742 Åland Islands 1,404 1,577
14743 Club Puebla 1,404 1,637
14744 Vietnam Republic 1,403 1,650
14745 US Rumelange 1,403 1,509
14746 Glentoran 1,403 1,508
14747 Etzella Ettelbrück 1,402 1,500
14748 Rabat Ajax 1,402 1,500
14749 SC Poltava 1,400 1,559
14750 India 1,400 1,649
page 295 / 299 ‹ prev next ›
Reading betting odds why the three prices add up to more than 100%

The prices on the fixtures page are decimal odds: what one unit returns, your stake included. At 3.50, a 20 Kč bet on the draw returns 70 Kč — 50 profit plus the 20 back.

Turn a price into a probability by dividing it into 1. 1 / 3.50 = 28.6%: that is how likely the bookmaker's price says a draw is. Do it for all three results of a match and they should add up to 100%. They never do.

The excess is the bookmaker's margin — its built-in profit, also called the overround. Spread the excess back out and you get the "fair" figures used in the tables above.

This is why betting every draw in any row above loses money: the prices are already close to what really happens, minus the margin. To profit you need odds longer than 1 / your own probability — on a team that draws a quarter of the time, better than 4.00.

Result Odds 1 / odds Margin removed
Home win 2.00 50.0% 48.3%
Draw 3.50 28.6% 27.6%
Away win 4.00 25.0% 24.1%
Total — 103.6% 100.0%

The three prices imply 103.6% of probability between them, so about 3.6% belongs to the bookmaker whatever happens. That cut is taken on every bet, win or lose, which is why the "betting them all" column above is negative even where the odds look generous.

FDB4 rates every team with Elo, replayed in date order over more than half a million matches: both sides start at 1500, the winner takes points from the loser, and a surprise or a wide margin moves the rating further. The page ranks the strongest clubs and national teams by current rating and peak, then shows how often each size of rating gap actually ended level — evenly matched sides draw roughly twice as often as mismatched ones. Alongside it sits the betting market's own figure for the same matches and a plain explanation of how decimal odds, implied probability and the bookmaker's margin fit together.

We use a session cookie to run the site and, if you allow it, Google Analytics to see which pages are used. No ads, no tracking across sites. Cookie policy