// Elo ratings 545,846 matches rated · 14,934 teams
Strength, and what it says about draws

How strong is a team, and how often do equals draw?

Every match in the database is replayed in date order. Both sides start at 1500; the winner takes points from the loser, more when the result was a surprise and more again when the margin was wide. A team's rating is therefore what its results have earned, and the gap between two ratings before kick-off is a measure of how uneven the match should be. The tables below show how often each size of gap ended level.

Matches rated545,846
Teams rated14,934
Evenly matched draw 27.39% gap under 25
Mismatch draw 13.96% gap 300+
Descriptive statistics, not betting advice → read this
Clubs: how often each rating gap drew 496,165 matches
Clubs: how often each rating gap drew 0% 15% 30% drew 0–24 — bookmaker's figure 28.79% 0–24 — drew 27.39% 27.4% 0–24 25–49 — bookmaker's figure 28.66% 25–49 — drew 26.31% 26.3% 25–49 50–74 — bookmaker's figure 28.34% 50–74 — drew 25.02% 25.0% 50–74 75–99 — bookmaker's figure 27.91% 75–99 — drew 25.21% 25.2% 75–99 100–149 — bookmaker's figure 26.93% 100–149 — drew 25.26% 25.3% 100–149 150–199 — bookmaker's figure 25.26% 150–199 — drew 23.72% 23.7% 150–199 200–299 — bookmaker's figure 22.31% 200–299 — drew 20.55% 20.6% 200–299 300+ — bookmaker's figure 16.00% 300+ — drew 13.96% 14.0% 300+ rating gap before kick-off
drew bookmaker's figure How often each rating gap actually drew, beside the draw chance the closing odds implied.
Rating gap Matches Drew Bookmaker's figure Return if you bet every draw
0–24 67,269 27.39% 28.79% -1.08%
25–49 72,944 26.31% 28.66% -3.14%
50–74 79,125 25.02% 28.34% -2.77%
75–99 64,786 25.21% 27.91% -2.60%
100–149 86,884 25.26% 26.93% -3.11%
150–199 53,208 23.72% 25.26% -2.52%
200–299 49,448 20.55% 22.31% -5.79%
300+ 22,501 13.96% 16.00% -12.49%

Evenly matched sides draw far more often than mismatched ones — the first row against the last is the whole story. The last three columns compare that with the betting market on the matches that carry a price: the bookmaker's figure tracks reality closely, and betting every draw loses money in every row. "Drew" and "Drew (those)" differ because priced matches are top divisions, which draw slightly more often.

National teams: how often each rating gap drew 49,681 matches
National teams: how often each rating gap drew 0% 15% 30% drew 0–24 — drew 27.50% 27.5% 0–24 25–49 — drew 25.37% 25.4% 25–49 50–74 — drew 26.90% 26.9% 50–74 75–99 — drew 25.86% 25.9% 75–99 100–149 — drew 24.58% 24.6% 100–149 150–199 — drew 23.11% 23.1% 150–199 200–299 — drew 19.92% 19.9% 200–299 300+ — drew 12.37% 12.4% 300+ rating gap before kick-off
drew How often each rating gap actually drew.
Rating gap Matches Drew Bookmaker's figure Return if you bet every draw
0–24 5,179 27.50% — —
25–49 5,077 25.37% — —
50–74 5,115 26.90% — —
75–99 4,618 25.86% — —
100–149 8,299 24.58% — —
150–199 6,447 23.11% — —
200–299 8,423 19.92% — —
300+ 6,523 12.37% — —
Top clubs by current rating
# Team Rating Peak
1 FC Bayern München 2,307 2,328
2 Manchester City 2,267 2,331
3 Arsenal 2,248 2,293
4 Barcelona 2,212 2,243
5 Paris Saint-Germain 2,155 2,231
6 Real Madrid 2,143 2,237
7 Inter Milan 2,130 2,202
8 FK Bodø/Glimt 2,124 2,143
9 Brighton & Hove Albion 2,113 2,113
10 Liverpool 2,085 2,285
11 Borussia Dortmund 2,084 2,116
12 Viking FK 2,083 2,097
13 Aston Villa 2,075 2,162
14 Brentford 2,070 2,070
15 Sporting CP 2,064 2,145
16 Bayer Leverkusen 2,063 2,190
17 Manchester United 2,060 2,147
18 Atlético Madrid 2,049 2,134
19 Bournemouth 2,041 2,073
20 Chelsea 2,039 2,185
21 SL Benfica 2,028 2,071
22 VfB Stuttgart 2,027 2,050
23 Leeds United 2,026 2,033
24 AS Roma 2,025 2,070
25 Porto 2,016 2,086
26 Zenit Saint Petersburg 2,010 2,011
27 Royale Union Saint-Gilloise 2,009 2,037
28 Everton 2,002 2,009
29 Newcastle United 1,993 2,141
30 Juventus 1,992 2,200
Top national teams by current rating
# Team Rating Peak
1 Spain 2,312 2,312
2 England 2,195 2,195
3 Argentina 2,190 2,200
4 France 2,157 2,210
5 Portugal 2,087 2,088
6 Morocco 2,075 2,106
7 Brazil 2,039 2,212
8 Colombia 2,033 2,115
9 Switzerland 2,033 2,033
10 Japan 2,026 2,064
11 Netherlands 2,023 2,177
12 Belgium 2,018 2,175
13 Norway 1,973 2,053
14 Germany 1,965 2,254
15 Mexico 1,965 2,054
16 Italy 1,957 2,095
17 Nigeria 1,949 1,962
18 Australia 1,936 2,002
19 Senegal 1,924 1,991
20 Croatia 1,923 2,036
21 United States 1,923 2,011
22 Ecuador 1,919 1,980
23 Austria 1,917 1,957
24 Algeria 1,911 1,961
25 Uruguay 1,909 2,056
26 Denmark 1,909 2,018
27 Paraguay 1,905 1,905
28 South Korea 1,901 1,986
29 Iran 1,900 2,017
30 Canada 1,878 2,010
All rated teams 14,934 teams
Clear
▸ Reset
# Team Rating Peak
14201 VV Capelle 1,449 1,527
14202 FC Diana Zürich 1,449 1,508
14203 Brasília 1,449 1,500
14204 Morön BK 1,448 1,500
14205 FC POHU/Simpsons 1,448 1,500
14206 Auckland City 1,448 1,500
14207 FC Bussigny 1,448 1,500
14208 Jeddah 1,448 1,503
14209 Apollon Smyrnis 1,448 1,649
14210 FC Zürich-Affoltern 1,448 1,500
14211 Ruch Wysokie Mazowieckie 1,448 1,500
14212 KCS Machelen 1,448 1,500
14213 KSK Vlamertinge 1,448 1,511
14214 SC Baudepartement Basel 1,448 1,500
14215 FC Clermont 1,448 1,500
14216 Haverfordwest County 1,448 1,500
14217 FC Albisrieden 1,448 1,500
14218 Sandnessjøen IL 1,448 1,506
14219 FC Snåbit 1,448 1,501
14220 Kasakh 1,448 1,500
14221 FC Plan-les-Ouates 1,448 1,522
14222 Star Sécheron 1,448 1,500
14223 Akratitos Ano Liosia 1,448 1,576
14224 Moelven IL 1,448 1,500
14225 Warta Sieradz 1,448 1,528
14226 RU Auderghem 1,448 1,500
14227 FC Fontenais 1,448 1,500
14228 Billericay Town 1,448 1,500
14229 Wisbech Town 1,448 1,500
14230 FC Bramois 1,448 1,500
14231 Vestfossen IF 1,448 1,546
14232 Binningen 1,448 1,530
14233 FK Saltdalkameratene 1,448 1,500
14234 Polonia Środa Wielkopolska 1,448 1,501
14235 Calthorpe 1,448 1,500
14236 Aurskog-Finstadbru SK 1,448 1,569
14237 FC Heiden 1,448 1,500
14238 TuS Koblenz 1,448 1,576
14239 FC Saint-Léonard 1,448 1,510
14240 Hølen IK 1,448 1,500
14241 Bjørkelangen SF 1,448 1,500
14242 FC Unterstrass 1,448 1,500
14243 IF Trauma 1,448 1,505
14244 Al Tai 1,448 1,527
14245 Fjøra FK 1,448 1,500
14246 Samtredia 1,448 1,500
14247 Gainsborough Trinity 1,448 1,545
14248 Borre IF 1,448 1,500
14249 Ħamrun Spartans 1,448 1,500
14250 Valtti/4 1,447 1,500
page 285 / 299 ‹ prev next ›
Reading betting odds why the three prices add up to more than 100%

The prices on the fixtures page are decimal odds: what one unit returns, your stake included. At 3.50, a 20 Kč bet on the draw returns 70 Kč — 50 profit plus the 20 back.

Turn a price into a probability by dividing it into 1. 1 / 3.50 = 28.6%: that is how likely the bookmaker's price says a draw is. Do it for all three results of a match and they should add up to 100%. They never do.

The excess is the bookmaker's margin — its built-in profit, also called the overround. Spread the excess back out and you get the "fair" figures used in the tables above.

This is why betting every draw in any row above loses money: the prices are already close to what really happens, minus the margin. To profit you need odds longer than 1 / your own probability — on a team that draws a quarter of the time, better than 4.00.

Result Odds 1 / odds Margin removed
Home win 2.00 50.0% 48.3%
Draw 3.50 28.6% 27.6%
Away win 4.00 25.0% 24.1%
Total — 103.6% 100.0%

The three prices imply 103.6% of probability between them, so about 3.6% belongs to the bookmaker whatever happens. That cut is taken on every bet, win or lose, which is why the "betting them all" column above is negative even where the odds look generous.

FDB4 rates every team with Elo, replayed in date order over more than half a million matches: both sides start at 1500, the winner takes points from the loser, and a surprise or a wide margin moves the rating further. The page ranks the strongest clubs and national teams by current rating and peak, then shows how often each size of rating gap actually ended level — evenly matched sides draw roughly twice as often as mismatched ones. Alongside it sits the betting market's own figure for the same matches and a plain explanation of how decimal odds, implied probability and the bookmaker's margin fit together.