RSC Anderlecht
What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 1 Oct 2026.
Over 502 matches (Jan 2015 – Sep 2026), RSC Anderlecht drew 127 where the draw model expected 115.2 from those particular fixtures — about 12 more, or 1.3 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 2 times running. A flat league average would have expected 118.5 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 19 Oct 2002 → 25 May 2003 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 26 | 31 Mar 1976 → 27 Aug 1977 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 23 | 15 Sep 1965 → 18 Oct 1967 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 19 | 17 Oct 2003 → 01 Feb 2004 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 19 | 13 Nov 1968 → 04 Feb 1970 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 17 | 30 Dec 2009 → 03 Aug 2010 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 16 | 18 Nov 2000 → 21 Feb 2001 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 16 | 23 Oct 1998 → 21 Mar 1999 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 15 | 23 Apr 2025 → 31 Aug 2025 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 15 | 28 Jul 2013 → 23 Oct 2013 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belgian Pro League | 1030 | 241 | 23.4% | 2 | 31 |
| Belgian Cup | 201 | 36 | 17.9% | 0 | 15 |
| UEFA Champions League | 195 | 43 | 22.1% | 6 | 15 |
| UEFA Europa League | 167 | 41 | 24.6% | 1 | 11 |
| UEFA Cup Winners' Cup | 44 | 4 | 9.1% | 0 | 12 |
| Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | 18 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 12 |
| UEFA Conference League | 16 | 5 | 31.3% | 1 | 3 |
| Club Friendlies | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 |
| UEFA Super Cup | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 35 | 8 | 22.9% | 8 |
| 2025 | 56 | 11 | 19.6% | 15 |
| 2024 | 50 | 13 | 26.0% | 12 |
| 2023 | 45 | 12 | 26.7% | 10 |
| 2022 | 43 | 10 | 23.3% | 8 |
| 2021 | 45 | 14 | 31.1% | 7 |
| 2020 | 27 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 |
| 2019 | 33 | 12 | 36.4% | 5 |
| 2018 | 38 | 10 | 26.3% | 11 |
| 2017 | 42 | 7 | 16.7% | 10 |
| 2016 | 44 | 10 | 22.7% | 9 |
| 2015 | 44 | 11 | 25.0% | 8 |
| 2014 | 41 | 13 | 31.7% | 8 |
| 2013 | 40 | 7 | 17.5% | 15 |
| 2012 | 42 | 11 | 26.2% | 15 |
| 2011 | 39 | 8 | 20.5% | 14 |
| 2010 | 49 | 9 | 18.4% | 16 |
| 2009 | 51 | 9 | 17.7% | 10 |
| 2008 | 43 | 6 | 14.0% | 10 |
| 2007 | 52 | 14 | 26.9% | 13 |
| 2006 | 40 | 12 | 30.0% | 9 |
| 2005 | 48 | 13 | 27.1% | 8 |
| 2004 | 46 | 9 | 19.6% | 15 |
| 2003 | 47 | 3 | 6.4% | 18 |
| 2002 | 43 | 10 | 23.3% | 12 |
| 2001 | 50 | 14 | 28.0% | 10 |
| 2000 | 49 | 11 | 22.5% | 8 |
| 1999 | 39 | 6 | 15.4% | 13 |
| 1998 | 43 | 13 | 30.2% | 8 |
| 1997 | 44 | 7 | 15.9% | 15 |
| 1996 | 40 | 13 | 32.5% | 6 |
| 1995 | 22 | 4 | 18.2% | 8 |
| 1994 | 11 | 5 | 45.5% | 2 |
| 1993 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 4 |
| 1992 | 10 | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
| 1991 | 6 | 3 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1990 | 13 | 3 | 23.1% | 5 |
| 1989 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 |
| 1988 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 |
| 1987 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1986 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 4 |
| 1985 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1984 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 3 |
| 1983 | 14 | 5 | 35.7% | 6 |
| 1982 | 19 | 2 | 10.5% | 13 |
| 1981 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 5 |
| 1980 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 5 |
| 1979 | 9 | 2 | 22.2% | 4 |
| 1978 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 7 |
| 1977 | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 7 |
| 1976 | 22 | 1 | 4.6% | 19 |
| 1975 | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | 11 |
| 1974 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 4 |
| 1973 | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 5 |
| 1972 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 |
| 1971 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 3 |
| 1970 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 |
| 1969 | 16 | 0 | 0.0% | 16 |
| 1968 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 3 |
| 1967 | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 5 |
| 1966 | 13 | 0 | 0.0% | 13 |
| 1965 | 9 | 2 | 22.2% | 5 |
| 1964 | 9 | 1 | 11.1% | 4 |
| 1963 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1962 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1959 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1956 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1955 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1953 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 1927 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1926 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| Date | Home | · | Away | 1 / X / 2 | Draw · logistic | Tournament |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 10 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 10 Oct 14:00 |
Cercle Brugge
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 25.3% |
|
| Thu, 15 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 15 Oct 19:00 |
GNK Dinamo Zagreb
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 26.7% |
|
| Thu, 22 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 22 Oct 19:00 |
Jagiellonia Białystok
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 25.3% |
|
| Sun, 25 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 25 Oct 17:30 |
KAA Gent
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 26.7% |
|
| Sat, 31 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 31 Oct 19:45 |
RSC Anderlecht
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 24.4% |
|
| Thu, 05 Nov 2026 | ||||||
| 05 Nov 17:45 |
RSC Anderlecht
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 25.3% |
|
| Sun, 08 Nov 2026 | ||||||
| 08 Nov 12:30 |
Club Brugge KV
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 19.1% |
|
Draw · logistic is the chance of a draw from the logistic draw model: five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at the Elo gap, the expected goals and the competition's own draw rate — fitted on every match played so far and recalibrated, then applied to fixtures not yet played. A dash means the model has not rated that fixture. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.