Queens Park Rangers
What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 1 Oct 2026.
Over 594 matches (Jan 2015 – Sep 2026), Queens Park Rangers drew 146 where the draw model expected 163.6 from those particular fixtures — about 18 fewer, or 1.6 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 3 times running. A flat league average would have expected 159.7 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | 12 Sep 1998 → 28 Nov 1998 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 15 | 30 Mar 2018 → 28 Aug 2018 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 15 | 21 Aug 2004 → 30 Oct 2004 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 14 | 01 Jan 2025 → 11 Mar 2025 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 13 | 09 Dec 1995 → 17 Feb 1996 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 13 | 04 Mar 1995 → 29 Apr 1995 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 12 | 18 Mar 2017 → 08 Aug 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 12 | 04 Jan 2015 → 04 Apr 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 12 | 10 Mar 2012 → 18 Aug 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 12 | 04 Nov 2006 → 01 Jan 2007 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Championship | 1112 | 315 | 28.3% | 0 | 17 |
| FA Cup | 281 | 73 | 26.0% | 0 | 4 |
| Premier League | 236 | 53 | 22.5% | 4 | 12 |
| League Cup | 190 | 36 | 19.0% | 0 | 7 |
| League One | 138 | 42 | 30.4% | 3 | 8 |
| Club Friendlies | 20 | 5 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 |
| UEFA Europa League | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | 4 | 5 |
| FA Community Shield | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 37 | 12 | 32.4% | 9 |
| 2025 | 51 | 9 | 17.7% | 14 |
| 2024 | 50 | 17 | 34.0% | 7 |
| 2023 | 48 | 12 | 25.0% | 10 |
| 2022 | 52 | 11 | 21.2% | 9 |
| 2021 | 53 | 11 | 20.8% | 10 |
| 2020 | 46 | 14 | 30.4% | 8 |
| 2019 | 52 | 11 | 21.2% | 11 |
| 2018 | 50 | 7 | 14.0% | 15 |
| 2017 | 51 | 12 | 23.5% | 12 |
| 2016 | 56 | 18 | 32.1% | 8 |
| 2015 | 48 | 12 | 25.0% | 12 |
| 2014 | 44 | 7 | 15.9% | 7 |
| 2013 | 46 | 14 | 30.4% | 6 |
| 2012 | 44 | 10 | 22.7% | 12 |
| 2011 | 44 | 13 | 29.5% | 9 |
| 2010 | 48 | 15 | 31.3% | 10 |
| 2009 | 48 | 18 | 37.5% | 5 |
| 2008 | 52 | 15 | 28.8% | 8 |
| 2007 | 48 | 15 | 31.3% | 8 |
| 2006 | 48 | 12 | 25.0% | 11 |
| 2005 | 49 | 16 | 32.7% | 6 |
| 2004 | 50 | 11 | 22.0% | 15 |
| 2003 | 50 | 13 | 26.0% | 7 |
| 2002 | 47 | 15 | 31.9% | 8 |
| 2001 | 51 | 16 | 31.4% | 7 |
| 2000 | 49 | 22 | 44.9% | 4 |
| 1999 | 49 | 16 | 32.7% | 11 |
| 1998 | 53 | 19 | 35.9% | 16 |
| 1997 | 51 | 13 | 25.5% | 11 |
| 1996 | 47 | 10 | 21.3% | 9 |
| 1995 | 49 | 7 | 14.3% | 13 |
| 1994 | 46 | 13 | 28.3% | 11 |
| 1993 | 28 | 5 | 17.9% | 9 |
| 1992 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1991 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 2 |
| 1990 | 13 | 6 | 46.2% | 2 |
| 1989 | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | 2 |
| 1988 | 9 | 2 | 22.2% | 3 |
| 1987 | 7 | 2 | 28.6% | 2 |
| 1986 | 9 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1985 | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 4 |
| 1984 | 11 | 2 | 18.2% | 7 |
| 1983 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 1982 | 11 | 4 | 36.4% | 4 |
| 1981 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1980 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1979 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 3 |
| 1978 | 9 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 |
| 1977 | 7 | 2 | 28.6% | 2 |
| 1976 | 14 | 2 | 14.3% | 9 |
| 1975 | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 3 |
| 1974 | 9 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1973 | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 3 |
| 1972 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 1971 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 2 |
| 1970 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1969 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 4 |
| 1968 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1967 | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 |
| 1966 | 9 | 2 | 22.2% | 5 |
| 1965 | 5 | 2 | 40.0% | 2 |
| 1964 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 3 |
| 1963 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 1962 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 1961 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 2 |
| 1960 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 3 |
| 1959 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 1958 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1957 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 1956 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1955 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1954 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1953 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 1952 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1951 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1950 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1949 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1948 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 3 |
| 1947 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1946 | 11 | 5 | 45.5% | 4 |
| 1945 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1939 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1938 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1937 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1936 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1935 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1934 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1933 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 |
| 1932 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1931 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1930 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 1929 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1928 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1927 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1925 | 5 | 2 | 40.0% | 1 |
| 1924 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1923 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1922 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1921 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1920 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1915 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 1914 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 4 |
| 1913 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1912 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 1911 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1910 | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | 2 |
| 1909 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1908 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 1907 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1906 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1900 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 |
| Date | Home | · | Away | 1 / X / 2 | Draw · logistic | Tournament |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 09 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 09 Oct 19:00 |
West Ham United
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 20.9% |
|
| Wed, 14 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 14 Oct 18:45 |
Queens Park Rangers
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 27.9% |
|
| Sat, 17 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 17 Oct 14:00 |
Birmingham City
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 27.9% |
|
| Sat, 24 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 24 Oct 14:00 |
Queens Park Rangers
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 29.6% |
|
| Sat, 31 Oct 2026 | ||||||
| 31 Oct 15:00 |
Southampton
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 20.9% |
|
| Tue, 03 Nov 2026 | ||||||
| 03 Nov 19:45 |
Queens Park Rangers
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 25.4% |
|
| Sat, 07 Nov 2026 | ||||||
| 07 Nov 15:00 |
Queens Park Rangers
|
vs |
|
– / – / – | 28.8% |
|
Draw · logistic is the chance of a draw from the logistic draw model: five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at the Elo gap, the expected goals and the competition's own draw rate — fitted on every match played so far and recalibrated, then applied to fixtures not yet played. A dash means the model has not rated that fixture. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.