Match ☆ 06 Jun 2004
NOR · Eliteserien · 2004
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Fredrikstad FK Lyn Fotball
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 4 3
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 17 30
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.63 0.70
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 14.0% 22.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 17.0% 24.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 19.8% 19.2%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 7
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 1.33

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 6 Jun 2004, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
Fredrikstad FK 1,715 after: 1,700
Lyn Fotball 1,785 after: 1,800
Rating gap -5 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 27.4% 0–24 · 67,288 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 2.01 – 1.42 home – away
Home win 50.8%
Draw 22.5% every level score added up
Away win 26.6%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 23.7% 75% goals model · 25% Elo gap
Goals model said 22.5% form only
This Elo gap said 27.4% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 24.4% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 24.4% – 24.4% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 23.7% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.