Match ☆ 19 Nov 2026 · 00:30 UTC
USA · MLS · 2026
USA Orlando City SC
Current form · last 20
W W L D L W D W W W L L L W D W D D L W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#17 / 30 · USA · MLS · 2026
As of this morning · domestic league only
–:–
Scheduled
USA FC Cincinnati
Current form · last 20
W W L W D W D L L D D L W L L W W D W L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#16 / 30 · USA · MLS · 2026
As of this morning · domestic league only
View head-to-head record →
The models forecast for this fixture
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Orlando City SC FC Cincinnati
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 2 2
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 17 22
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.44 0.41
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 20.0% 24.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 23.0% 18.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 26.7% 24.5%
Draw scorethe predictor ranking score 0.154 0.140
Rankposition in that ranking 1,045 1,171
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 4
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.84
Σ Scorewhat the Cross predictor orders by 0.294
Team strength · Elo
Orlando City SC 1,583
FC Cincinnati 1,582
Rating gap +66 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 25.0% 50–74 · 79,418 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 2.48 – 1.83 home – away
Home win 52.0%
Draw 19.7% every level score added up
Away win 28.3%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 21.2% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 19.7% form only
This Elo gap said 25.0% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 20.8% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 19.8% – 20.8% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 21.2% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. This is a real forecast: the fixture had not been played when the model was fitted.

A forecast from every match played so far. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.

League table · MLS · 2026 Current indexed standings

This edition’s latest indexed table, not the standings before this match. Both teams are highlighted.

# Team P W D L GD Pts
1 Nashville SC 34 23 8 3 +46 77
2 Vancouver Whitecaps 34 19 7 8 +40 64
3 Inter Miami CF 34 16 12 6 +21 60
4 FC Dallas 34 16 10 8 +11 58
5 New England Revolution 34 18 4 12 +8 58
6 Chicago Fire 34 16 7 11 +10 55
7 Charlotte 34 15 9 10 +15 54
8 St. Louis City SC 34 15 9 10 +11 54
9 San Jose Earthquakes 34 14 10 10 +6 52
10 Houston Dynamo 34 14 9 11 0 51
11 Philadelphia Union 34 14 8 12 +14 50
12 Los Angeles FC 34 12 11 11 +12 47
13 Columbus Crew 34 14 5 15 +7 47
14 Portland Timbers 34 13 7 14 +1 46
15 Seattle Sounders 34 12 10 12 -2 46
16 FC Cincinnati 34 12 10 12 -8 46
17 Orlando City SC 34 13 7 14 -15 46
18 Real Salt Lake 34 13 6 15 +1 45
19 Minnesota United 34 11 11 12 -2 44
20 LA Galaxy 34 11 11 12 -7 44
21 Colorado Rapids 34 12 7 15 -3 43
22 New York City 34 10 12 12 +4 42
23 New York Red Bulls 34 12 6 16 -14 42
24 Toronto FC 34 9 12 13 -15 39
25 San Diego FC 34 9 11 14 -6 38
26 Austin FC 34 8 10 16 -23 34
27 Atlanta United 34 9 6 19 -17 33
28 D.C. United 34 7 12 15 -22 33
29 CF Montréal 34 6 8 20 -32 26
30 Sporting Kansas City 34 7 5 22 -41 26