Match ☆ 18 Feb 1995
ENG · Premier League · 1994
ENG Coventry City
Current form · last 20
D D D W W W D W W L W L L L L W W L L W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#16 / 20 · ENG · Premier League · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
2–0
FT · Home win
ENG West Ham United
Current form · last 20
D W D D W D L W D W W W W L D D W W L L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#8 / 24 · ENG · Championship · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Coventry City West Ham United
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 2 0
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 9 16
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.62 0.00
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 32.0% 20.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 30.0% 26.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 22.4% 25.5%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 2
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.62

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 18 Feb 1995, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
Coventry City 1,563 after: 1,575
West Ham United 1,562 after: 1,550
Rating gap +66 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 25.0% 50–74 · 79,350 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.20 – 1.07 home – away
Home win 38.4%
Draw 29.9% every level score added up
Away win 31.8%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 28.4% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 29.9% form only
This Elo gap said 25.0% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 28.2% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 28.2% – 29.0% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 28.4% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.

League table · Premier League · 19941995 Final standings

This edition’s latest indexed table, not the standings before this match. Both teams are highlighted.

# Team P W D L GD Pts
1 Blackburn Rovers Champion 42 27 8 7 +41 89
2 Manchester United 42 26 10 6 +49 88
3 Nottingham Forest 42 22 11 9 +29 77
4 Liverpool 42 21 11 10 +28 74
5 Leeds United 42 20 13 9 +21 73
6 Newcastle United 42 20 12 10 +20 72
7 Tottenham Hotspur 42 16 14 12 +8 62
8 Queens Park Rangers 42 17 9 16 +2 60
9 Wimbledon 42 15 11 16 -17 56
10 Southampton 42 12 18 12 -2 54
11 Chelsea 42 13 15 14 -5 54
12 Arsenal 42 13 12 17 +3 51
13 Sheffield Wednesday 42 13 12 17 -8 51
14 West Ham United 42 13 11 18 -4 50
15 Everton 42 11 17 14 -7 50
16 Coventry City 42 12 14 16 -18 50
17 Manchester City 42 12 13 17 -11 49
18 Aston Villa 42 11 15 16 -5 48
19 Crystal Palace 42 11 12 19 -15 45
20 Norwich City 42 10 13 19 -17 43
21 Leicester City 42 6 11 25 -35 29
22 Ipswich Town 42 7 6 29 -57 27