Match ☆ 05 Mar 1994
GER · 2. Bundesliga · 1993
GER TSV 1860 München
Current form · last 20
D D D L W W W W W D L D L D D W D L L L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
Current league standing unavailable
As of this morning · domestic league only
1–3
FT · Away win
GER Stuttgarter Kickers
Current form · last 20
L L D L L D D L L W D W L W L W W W W L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
Current league standing unavailable
As of this morning · domestic league only
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure TSV 1860 München Stuttgarter Kickers
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 2 0
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 9 7
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.40 0.00
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 20.0% 28.6%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 20.0% 28.6%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 20.0% 28.6%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 2
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.40

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 5 Mar 1994, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
TSV 1860 München 1,562 after: 1,539
Stuttgarter Kickers 1,448 after: 1,471
Rating gap +178 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 23.7% 150–199 · 53,406 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.96 – 0.76 home – away
Home win 65.3%
Draw 21.7% every level score added up
Away win 13.1%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 22.3% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 21.7% form only
This Elo gap said 23.7% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 25.2% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 25.2% – 25.2% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 22.3% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.

League table · 2. Bundesliga · 19931994 Final standings

This edition’s latest indexed table, not the standings before this match. Both teams are highlighted.

# Team P W D L GD Pts
1 VfL Bochum Champion 38 19 10 9 +22 48
2 KFC Uerdingen 05 38 18 11 9 +19 47
3 TSV 1860 München 38 19 9 10 +17 47
4 FC St. Pauli 38 17 11 10 +8 45
5 VfL Wolfsburg 38 15 10 13 +2 40
6 Waldhof Mannheim 38 12 16 10 0 40
7 SV Meppen 38 14 11 13 -4 39
8 Hansa Rostock 38 15 9 14 -5 39
9 Chemnitzer 38 14 11 13 -10 39
10 FC 08 Homburg 38 13 11 14 +7 37
11 Hertha BSC 38 11 15 12 +6 37
12 Hannover 96 38 12 13 13 +3 37
13 Mainz 05 38 13 11 14 -5 37
14 1. FC Saarbrücken 38 14 9 15 -11 37
15 SC Fortuna Köln 38 13 10 15 +4 36
16 Stuttgarter Kickers 38 11 13 14 -8 35
17 Carl Zeiss Jena 38 9 16 13 -3 34
18 Wuppertaler SV 38 10 11 17 -8 31
19 Rot-Weiss Essen 38 9 11 18 -16 29
20 Tennis Borussia Berlin 38 7 12 19 -18 26