Match ☆ 09 Mar 1996
GER · Bundesliga · 1995
GER TSV 1860 München
Current form · last 20
D D D L W W W W W D L D L D D W D L L L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
Current league standing unavailable
As of this morning · domestic league only
1–1
FT · Draw
GER Werder Bremen
Current form · last 20
L W D L L L W W D L W L W D W D D W L W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#5 / 18 · GER · Bundesliga · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
HT 1–0
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure TSV 1860 München Werder Bremen
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 7 2
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 9 8
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 2.03 0.61
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 32.0% 30.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 27.0% 31.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 26.0% 26.0%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 9
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 2.64

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 9 Mar 1996, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
TSV 1860 München 1,600 after: 1,599
Werder Bremen 1,638 after: 1,639
Rating gap +27 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 26.3% 25–49 · 73,141 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.51 – 1.29 home – away
Home win 41.8%
Draw 26.3% every level score added up
Away win 31.9%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 26.3% 75% goals model · 25% Elo gap
Goals model said 26.3% form only
This Elo gap said 26.3% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 27.5% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 27.5% – 27.7% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 26.3% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.

League table · Bundesliga · 19951996 Final standings

This edition’s latest indexed table, not the standings before this match. Both teams are highlighted.

# Team P W D L GD Pts
1 Borussia Dortmund Champion 34 19 11 4 +38 68
2 FC Bayern München 34 19 5 10 +20 62
3 Schalke 04 34 14 14 6 +9 56
4 M'gladbach 34 15 8 11 +1 53
5 Hamburger SV 34 12 14 8 +5 50
6 Hansa Rostock 34 13 10 11 +4 49
7 Karlsruher SC 34 12 12 10 +6 48
8 TSV 1860 München 34 11 12 11 +6 45
9 Werder Bremen 34 10 14 10 -3 44
10 VfB Stuttgart 34 10 13 11 -3 43
11 SC Freiburg 34 11 9 14 -11 42
12 1. FC Köln 34 9 13 12 -2 40
13 Fortuna Düsseldorf 34 8 16 10 -7 40
14 Bayer Leverkusen 34 8 14 12 -1 38
15 FC St. Pauli 34 9 11 14 -8 38
16 1. FC Kaiserslautern 34 6 18 10 -6 36
17 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 7 11 16 -25 32
18 KFC Uerdingen 05 34 5 11 18 -23 26