Match ☆ 23 Nov 1996
ENG · Premier League · 1996
ENG West Ham United
Current form · last 20
D W D D W D L W D W W W W L D D W W L L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#8 / 24 · ENG · Championship · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
1–1
FT · Draw
ENG Derby County
Current form · last 20
L L W L D L L D L W L L L D D L L D L L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#23 / 24 · ENG · Championship · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
HT 1–1
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure West Ham United Derby County
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 0 3
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 16 17
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.00 0.94
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 22.0% 32.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 23.0% 31.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 25.7% 23.1%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 3
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.94

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 23 Nov 1996, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
West Ham United 1,643 after: 1,641
Derby County 1,633 after: 1,635
Rating gap +75 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 25.2% 75–99 · 64,966 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.26 – 1.10 home – away
Home win 39.5%
Draw 29.1% every level score added up
Away win 31.3%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 27.9% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 29.1% form only
This Elo gap said 25.2% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 28.1% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 28.1% – 28.2% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 27.9% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.

League table · Premier League · 19961997 Final standings

This edition’s latest indexed table, not the standings before this match. Both teams are highlighted.

# Team P W D L GD Pts
1 Manchester United Champion 38 21 12 5 +32 75
2 Newcastle United 38 19 11 8 +33 68
3 Arsenal 38 19 11 8 +30 68
4 Liverpool 38 19 11 8 +25 68
5 Aston Villa 38 17 10 11 +13 61
6 Chelsea 38 16 11 11 +3 59
7 Sheffield Wednesday 38 14 15 9 -1 57
8 Wimbledon 38 15 11 12 +3 56
9 Leicester City 38 12 11 15 -8 47
10 Tottenham Hotspur 38 13 7 18 -7 46
11 Leeds United 38 11 13 14 -10 46
12 Derby County 38 11 13 14 -13 46
13 Blackburn Rovers 38 9 15 14 -1 42
14 Middlesbrough 38 10 12 16 -9 42
15 West Ham United 38 10 12 16 -9 42
16 Everton 38 10 12 16 -13 42
17 Southampton 38 10 11 17 -6 41
18 Coventry City 38 9 14 15 -16 41
19 Sunderland 38 10 10 18 -18 40
20 Nottingham Forest 38 6 16 16 -28 34