Match ☆ 02 May 2026 · 14:00 UTC
ENG · League Two · 2025
HT 0–0 Referee: N Hair
View head-to-head record →
Match stats
8 Shots 10
2 Shots on target 5
8 Corners 6
12 Fouls 20
1 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 0
Betting odds
1X2 (match) betting odds
Bet365 home win odds 5.75
Bet365 draw odds 4
Bet365 away win odds 1.51
Bet&Win home win odds 5.75
Bet&Win draw odds 3.9
Bet&Win away win odds 1.57
Ladbrokes home win odds 5.75
Ladbrokes draw odds 3.9
Ladbrokes away win odds 1.57
Market maximum home win odds 6.5
Market maximum draw odds 4
Market maximum away win odds 1.57
Market average home win odds 5.94
Market average draw odds 3.94
Market average away win odds 1.53
BFD home win odds 6.5
BFD draw odds 4
BFD away win odds 1.53
BetMGM home win odds 6.4
BetMGM draw odds 4
BetMGM away win odds 1.47
BetVictor home win odds 6
BetVictor draw odds 4
BetVictor away win odds 1.55
CL home win odds 5.75
CL draw odds 3.9
CL away win odds 1.57
Total goals (over/under) betting odds
Bet365 over 2.5 goals 2.03
Bet365 under 2.5 goals 1.83
Market maximum over 2.5 goals 2.03
Market maximum under 2.5 goals 1.91
Market average over 2.5 goals 1.92
Market average under 2.5 goals 1.79
Asian handicap betting odds
Asian handicap size (home team) 1
Bet365 Asian handicap home odds 1.83
Bet365 Asian handicap away odds 2.03
Market maximum Asian handicap home odds 1.85
Market maximum Asian handicap away odds 2.03
Market average Asian handicap home odds 1.8
Market average Asian handicap away odds 1.93
Closing odds (last odds before kick-off)
Bet365 home win odds 6.25
Bet365 draw odds 4.33
Bet365 away win odds 1.42
Bet&Win home win odds 6.25
Bet&Win draw odds 4.1
Bet&Win away win odds 1.5
Ladbrokes home win odds 6.5
Ladbrokes draw odds 4.2
Ladbrokes away win odds 1.5
Market maximum home win odds 7.4
Market maximum draw odds 4.75
Market maximum away win odds 1.5
Market average home win odds 6.58
Market average draw odds 4.23
Market average away win odds 1.45
BFD home win odds 7
BFD draw odds 4.33
BFD away win odds 1.44
BetMGM home win odds 6.4
BetMGM draw odds 4
BetMGM away win odds 1.47
BetVictor home win odds 7
BetVictor draw odds 4.33
BetVictor away win odds 1.45
Bet365 over 2.5 goals 1.85
Bet365 under 2.5 goals 1.95
Market maximum over 2.5 goals 1.91
Market maximum under 2.5 goals 2
Market average over 2.5 goals 1.84
Market average under 2.5 goals 1.87
Asian handicap size (home team) 1.25
Bet365 Asian handicap home odds 1.78
Bet365 Asian handicap away odds 2.1
Market maximum Asian handicap home odds 1.8
Market maximum Asian handicap away odds 2.1
Market average Asian handicap home odds 1.73
Market average Asian handicap away odds 2.01
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Crewe Alexandra Cambridge United
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 7 2
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 26 15
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 1.64 0.59
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 18.0% 32.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 27.0% 28.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 23.4% 26.7%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 9
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 2.23

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 2 May 2026, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
Crewe Alexandra 1,486 after: 1,488
Cambridge United 1,622 after: 1,620
Rating gap -70 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 25.0% 50–74 · 79,145 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.04 – 1.29 home – away
Home win 29.4%
Draw 29.2% every level score added up
Away win 41.4%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 27.9% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 29.2% form only
This Elo gap said 25.0% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 29.1% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 29.0% – 29.5% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 27.9% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.