Team strength · Elo all ratings ›
Rating 1,479 everyone starts at 1500
Peak 1,633 reached 15 Sep 1930
Rank #10,063 of 14,598 clubs
Matches rated 213 last 17 Apr 2013

What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 4 Nov 2026.

Longest no-draw runs all on the records page ›
By competition (all-time)
CompetitionPDDraw%
Norwegian Football Cup 169 17 10.1%
1. divisjon 30 11 36.7%
Eliteserien 14 5 35.7%
By calendar year
YearPDDraw%Max
2013 1 0 0.0% 1
2012 1 0 0.0% 1
2010 2 0 0.0% 2
2009 33 11 33.3% 6
2008 2 0 0.0% 2
2007 1 0 0.0% 1
2006 1 1 100.0% 0
1996 1 0 0.0% 1
1981 1 0 0.0% 1
1980 1 0 0.0% 1
1979 2 1 50.0% 1
1978 1 0 0.0% 1
1977 2 0 0.0% 2
1976 2 0 0.0% 2
1975 2 1 50.0% 1
1974 1 0 0.0% 1
1973 1 0 0.0% 1
1968 1 0 0.0% 1
1966 3 1 33.3% 2
1965 3 0 0.0% 3
1964 1 0 0.0% 1
1963 3 0 0.0% 3
1962 3 1 33.3% 2
1961 9 4 44.4% 2
1960 10 2 20.0% 3
1959 1 0 0.0% 1
1958 3 0 0.0% 3
1957 2 1 50.0% 1
1956 1 0 0.0% 1
1955 2 0 0.0% 2
1954 3 0 0.0% 3
1953 5 0 0.0% 5
1952 2 0 0.0% 2
1951 1 0 0.0% 1
1950 2 1 50.0% 1
1949 5 1 20.0% 3
1948 5 1 20.0% 2
1947 1 0 0.0% 1
1946 4 0 0.0% 4
1945 4 0 0.0% 4
1940 3 0 0.0% 3
1939 2 1 50.0% 1
1938 2 0 0.0% 2
1937 2 0 0.0% 2
1936 2 0 0.0% 2
1935 4 0 0.0% 4
1934 3 0 0.0% 3
1933 4 1 25.0% 2
1932 3 0 0.0% 3
1931 3 0 0.0% 3
1930 6 1 16.7% 4
1929 6 0 0.0% 6
1928 3 0 0.0% 3
1927 3 0 0.0% 3
1926 3 0 0.0% 3
1925 4 0 0.0% 4
1924 2 1 50.0% 1
1923 3 0 0.0% 3
1922 3 0 0.0% 3
1921 3 0 0.0% 3
1920 1 0 0.0% 1
1919 3 0 0.0% 3
1918 3 2 66.7% 1
1917 3 0 0.0% 3
1916 2 1 50.0% 1
1914 2 0 0.0% 2
1913 2 0 0.0% 2
1912 2 0 0.0% 2
1911 1 0 0.0% 1
1910 1 0 0.0% 1

Over 213 matches (Sep 1910 – Apr 2013), Stavanger IF Fotball drew 33 where the draw model expected 32.2 from those particular fixtures — about 1 more, or 0.1 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.

A flat league average would have expected 34.4 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.