What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 13 Feb 2026 → 23 May 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 11 | 25 Aug 2007 → 27 Oct 2007 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 10 | 22 Feb 2025 → 04 May 2025 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 9 | 14 Nov 2008 → 24 Jan 2009 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 9 | 03 May 2008 → 16 Sep 2008 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 8 | 07 May 2021 → 21 Sep 2021 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 8 | 28 Feb 2009 → 18 Apr 2009 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 7 | 31 Aug 2024 → 19 Oct 2024 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 7 | 27 Feb 2022 → 02 Apr 2022 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 7 | 20 Mar 2018 → 28 Apr 2018 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serie B | 364 | 125 | 34.3% | 1 | 11 |
| Serie C | 72 | 25 | 34.7% | 2 | 7 |
| Serie A | 38 | 12 | 31.6% | 14 | 14 |
| Coppa Italia | 36 | 8 | 22.2% | 1 | 3 |
| Club Friendlies | 7 | 2 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 35 | 9 | 25.7% | 14 |
| 2025 | 40 | 12 | 30.0% | 10 |
| 2024 | 42 | 12 | 28.6% | 7 |
| 2023 | 39 | 13 | 33.3% | 5 |
| 2022 | 40 | 16 | 40.0% | 7 |
| 2021 | 42 | 13 | 31.0% | 8 |
| 2020 | 37 | 13 | 35.1% | 5 |
| 2019 | 39 | 12 | 30.8% | 5 |
| 2018 | 38 | 12 | 31.6% | 7 |
| 2017 | 43 | 21 | 48.8% | 4 |
| 2016 | 24 | 11 | 45.8% | 4 |
| 2015 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2014 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2013 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2012 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2009 | 23 | 7 | 30.4% | 8 |
| 2008 | 43 | 14 | 32.6% | 9 |
| 2007 | 21 | 6 | 28.6% | 11 |
Over 421 matches (Aug 2015 – Nov 2026), Pisa SC drew 144 where the draw model expected 128.1 from those particular fixtures — about 16 more, or 1.7 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 3 times running. A flat league average would have expected 128.4 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.