NOR · Club

Kjelsås Fotball ☆

Statistics
Team strength · Elo all ratings ›
Rating 1,573 everyone starts at 1500
Peak 1,648 reached 18 Jul 1999
Rank #681 of 14,598 clubs
Matches rated 240 last 16 Sep 2026

What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.

Longest no-draw runs all on the records page ›
By competition (all-time)
CompetitionPDDraw%
Norwegian Football Cup 132 17 12.9%
1. divisjon 108 30 27.8%
By calendar year
YearPDDraw%Max
2026 2 0 0.0% 2
2025 5 1 20.0% 4
2024 3 0 0.0% 3
2023 6 1 16.7% 5
2022 3 1 33.3% 2
2021 2 0 0.0% 2
2019 2 1 50.0% 1
2018 2 0 0.0% 2
2017 3 0 0.0% 3
2016 2 0 0.0% 2
2015 2 0 0.0% 2
2014 1 0 0.0% 1
2013 2 0 0.0% 2
2012 2 0 0.0% 2
2011 3 0 0.0% 3
2010 2 0 0.0% 2
2009 2 1 50.0% 1
2008 1 0 0.0% 1
2007 1 0 0.0% 1
2006 2 0 0.0% 2
2005 2 0 0.0% 2
2004 1 0 0.0% 1
2003 1 0 0.0% 1
2002 2 2 100.0% 0
2001 32 7 21.9% 12
2000 28 9 32.1% 6
1999 30 9 30.0% 6
1998 29 8 27.6% 5
1997 1 0 0.0% 1
1996 2 0 0.0% 2
1995 3 0 0.0% 3
1994 1 0 0.0% 1
1993 2 0 0.0% 2
1992 2 0 0.0% 2
1991 2 0 0.0% 2
1990 2 0 0.0% 2
1989 1 0 0.0% 1
1988 3 0 0.0% 3
1987 4 0 0.0% 4
1986 2 1 50.0% 1
1985 2 0 0.0% 2
1983 1 0 0.0% 1
1982 1 0 0.0% 1
1981 2 1 50.0% 1
1979 1 0 0.0% 1
1977 1 0 0.0% 1
1972 3 2 66.7% 1
1971 1 0 0.0% 1
1970 1 0 0.0% 1
1961 1 0 0.0% 1
1960 1 0 0.0% 1
1958 1 0 0.0% 1
1954 1 1 100.0% 0
1952 1 0 0.0% 1
1951 1 0 0.0% 1
1950 1 0 0.0% 1
1949 2 0 0.0% 2
1948 3 1 33.3% 2
1947 2 0 0.0% 2
1946 3 0 0.0% 3
1945 1 0 0.0% 1
1940 2 1 50.0% 1
1939 2 0 0.0% 2
1938 3 0 0.0% 3
1937 1 0 0.0% 1
1936 1 0 0.0% 1
1934 1 0 0.0% 1
1933 1 0 0.0% 1

Over 240 matches (Aug 1933 – Sep 2026), Kjelsås Fotball drew 47 where the draw model expected 45.6 from those particular fixtures — about 1 more, or 0.2 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.

A flat league average would have expected 42.7 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.