What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 22 Aug 2016 → 01 Oct 2016 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 5 | 17 Jul 2017 → 13 Aug 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 4 | 02 Apr 2016 → 17 Apr 2016 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 3 | 18 Feb 2023 → 04 Mar 2023 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 3 | 30 Sep 2020 → 13 Dec 2020 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 3 | 16 Feb 2019 → 02 Mar 2019 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 3 | 17 Apr 2017 → 27 Apr 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 3 | 10 Jul 2016 → 24 Jul 2016 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 3 | 21 Feb 2015 → 07 Mar 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 3 | 03 Mar 2013 → 16 Mar 2013 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allsvenskan | 64 | 24 | 37.5% | 2 | 7 |
| Swedish Cup | 56 | 11 | 19.6% | 1 | 3 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2020 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 3 |
| 2019 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 3 |
| 2018 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 |
| 2017 | 33 | 14 | 42.4% | 5 |
| 2016 | 34 | 12 | 35.3% | 8 |
| 2015 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2014 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 1 |
| 2013 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 2011 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2010 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2009 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2008 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2006 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1971 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
Over 120 matches (Apr 1971 – Aug 2024), Jönköpings Södra IF drew 35 where the draw model expected 26.8 from those particular fixtures — about 8 more, or 1.8 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 4 times running. A flat league average would have expected 26.2 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.