What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 29 Jul 2012 → 23 Sep 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 9 | 02 Oct 2013 → 30 Apr 2014 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 9 | 27 May 2012 → 15 Jul 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 7 | 05 Aug 2017 → 10 Sep 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 7 | 19 Apr 2012 → 21 May 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 6 | 15 Jun 2017 → 16 Jul 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 6 | 20 Jan 2017 → 08 Apr 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 6 | 26 May 2013 → 19 Jun 2013 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 5 | 06 May 2017 → 27 May 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 5 | 05 May 2013 → 20 May 2013 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veikkausliiga | 99 | 22 | 22.2% | 3 | 9 |
| Finnish Cup | 47 | 10 | 21.3% | 0 | 5 |
| UEFA Europa League | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2023 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2017 | 38 | 8 | 21.1% | 7 |
| 2016 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 |
| 2015 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2014 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 |
| 2013 | 36 | 11 | 30.6% | 6 |
| 2012 | 39 | 4 | 10.3% | 12 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2009 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2007 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2005 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2004 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
Over 150 matches (May 2004 – Apr 2025), JJK Jyväskylä drew 32 where the draw model expected 31.6 from those particular fixtures — about 0 more, or 0.1 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.
A flat league average would have expected 32.9 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.