What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | 19 Jun 2016 → 15 Oct 2016 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 12 | 27 Oct 2018 → 02 May 2019 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 11 | 23 Sep 2017 → 06 Apr 2018 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 9 | 30 May 2015 → 15 Jul 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 9 | 23 Oct 2014 → 05 Apr 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 8 | 06 Aug 2014 → 17 Sep 2014 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 5 | 25 Jul 2015 → 23 Aug 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 5 | 30 Apr 2014 → 25 May 2014 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 4 | 04 Aug 2020 → 20 Aug 2020 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 4 | 13 Aug 2019 → 20 Oct 2019 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super League | 200 | 61 | 30.5% | 1 | 14 |
| Chinese FA Cup | 62 | 13 | 21.0% | 1 | 7 |
| Club Friendlies | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 26 | 11 | 42.3% | 4 |
| 2019 | 32 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 |
| 2018 | 35 | 11 | 31.4% | 5 |
| 2017 | 34 | 12 | 35.3% | 6 |
| 2016 | 37 | 8 | 21.6% | 19 |
| 2015 | 37 | 10 | 27.0% | 9 |
| 2014 | 37 | 10 | 27.0% | 8 |
| 2013 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2004 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2003 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1999 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1998 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1996 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1995 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
Over 201 matches (Mar 2015 – Dec 2020), Jiangsu Suning drew 60 where the draw model expected 50.0 from those particular fixtures — about 10 more, or 1.6 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 3 times running. A flat league average would have expected 49.5 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.