What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 26 Aug 2013 → 27 Apr 2014 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 11 | 02 Aug 2025 → 18 Oct 2025 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 8 | 08 May 2014 → 15 Jun 2014 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 7 | 24 Jul 2026 → 08 Sep 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 7 | 09 May 2026 → 17 Jun 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 7 | 19 Sep 2014 → 14 Mar 2015 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 7 | 19 Apr 2012 → 12 May 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 6 | 28 Jan 2017 → 18 Mar 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 6 | 29 Jul 2012 → 02 Sep 2012 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 5 | 14 Jun 2025 → 02 Jul 2025 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veikkausliiga | 191 | 52 | 27.2% | 1 | 10 |
| Finnish Cup | 57 | 8 | 14.0% | 2 | 6 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 29 | 10 | 34.5% | 7 |
| 2025 | 31 | 6 | 19.4% | 11 |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2022 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 2017 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2015 | 34 | 11 | 32.4% | 5 |
| 2014 | 34 | 8 | 23.5% | 8 |
| 2013 | 34 | 10 | 29.4% | 9 |
| 2012 | 35 | 10 | 28.6% | 7 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2010 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2009 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2008 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 2007 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2006 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2003 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2000 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1999 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1992 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
Over 111 matches (Mar 2015 – Oct 2026), FF Jaro drew 28 where the draw model expected 26.0 from those particular fixtures — about 2 more, or 0.4 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.
A flat league average would have expected 26.2 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.