What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 06 Sep 2000 → 18 Feb 2001 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 17 | 28 Oct 1999 → 19 Mar 2000 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 12 | 05 Oct 1996 → 18 Jan 1997 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 12 | 11 Mar 1996 → 17 Aug 1996 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 9 | 16 Oct 1995 → 23 Dec 1995 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 8 | 02 Apr 2000 → 19 Aug 2000 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 8 | 15 Feb 1998 → 11 Apr 1998 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 6 | 13 Mar 1999 → 01 May 1999 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 6 | 25 Apr 1998 → 30 Aug 1998 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 5 | 16 Jan 1999 → 28 Feb 1999 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belgian Pro League | 204 | 45 | 22.1% | 4 | 20 |
| Belgian Cup | 44 | 15 | 34.1% | 1 | 3 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2018 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 3 |
| 2017 | 3 | 2 | 66.7% | 1 |
| 2001 | 16 | 3 | 18.8% | 5 |
| 2000 | 36 | 2 | 5.6% | 16 |
| 1999 | 34 | 8 | 23.5% | 7 |
| 1998 | 38 | 12 | 31.6% | 8 |
| 1997 | 34 | 15 | 44.1% | 3 |
| 1996 | 33 | 5 | 15.2% | 12 |
| 1995 | 20 | 2 | 10.0% | 9 |
| 1983 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 1982 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 1981 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1980 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| 1978 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1977 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 |
| 1976 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 1975 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1974 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1967 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1965 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1964 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
Over 248 matches (Aug 1964 – Nov 2023), KRC Harelbeke drew 60 where the draw model expected 57.9 from those particular fixtures — about 2 more, or 0.3 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.
A flat league average would have expected 57.8 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.