NOR · Club

FK Eik Tønsberg ☆

Statistics
Team strength · Elo all ratings ›
Rating 1,492 everyone starts at 1500
Peak 1,678 reached 11 Oct 1959
Rank #5,624 of 14,598 clubs
Matches rated 549 last 22 Aug 2026

What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.

Longest no-draw runs all on the records page ›
By competition (all-time)
CompetitionPDDraw%
1. divisjon 236 53 22.5%
Norwegian Football Cup 158 27 17.1%
Eliteserien 154 30 19.5%
Club Friendlies 1 0 0.0%
By calendar year
YearPDDraw%Max
2026 2 0 0.0% 1
2025 4 0 0.0% 4
2024 2 0 0.0% 2
2023 2 1 50.0% 1
2022 1 1 100.0% 0
2021 1 0 0.0% 1
2018 1 0 0.0% 1
2011 1 0 0.0% 1
2007 1 0 0.0% 1
2006 1 0 0.0% 1
2004 1 0 0.0% 1
2003 1 0 0.0% 1
2002 1 0 0.0% 1
2001 2 1 50.0% 1
2000 30 5 16.7% 7
1999 27 7 25.9% 5
1998 29 8 27.6% 10
1997 30 9 30.0% 7
1996 25 4 16.0% 9
1995 27 6 22.2% 9
1994 25 5 20.0% 9
1993 26 7 26.9% 10
1992 25 4 16.0% 9
1991 27 4 14.8% 9
1990 4 2 50.0% 2
1989 7 2 28.6% 4
1988 4 1 25.0% 2
1987 1 1 100.0% 0
1986 1 0 0.0% 1
1985 25 5 20.0% 10
1984 24 4 16.7% 6
1983 25 6 24.0% 7
1982 3 0 0.0% 3
1981 2 0 0.0% 2
1980 3 1 33.3% 1
1979 3 0 0.0% 3
1978 2 0 0.0% 2
1977 1 0 0.0% 1
1976 1 0 0.0% 1
1975 2 0 0.0% 2
1974 2 0 0.0% 2
1973 1 0 0.0% 1
1972 1 0 0.0% 1
1971 2 1 50.0% 1
1970 1 0 0.0% 1
1969 2 0 0.0% 2
1968 1 0 0.0% 1
1967 2 0 0.0% 2
1966 3 1 33.3% 1
1965 5 1 20.0% 2
1964 2 0 0.0% 2
1963 5 1 20.0% 2
1962 24 4 16.7% 14
1961 21 4 19.1% 9
1960 16 3 18.8% 8
1959 17 3 17.7% 10
1958 21 6 28.6% 5
1957 10 1 10.0% 5
1956 2 0 0.0% 2
1955 2 0 0.0% 2
1954 2 0 0.0% 2
1953 1 0 0.0% 1
1952 1 0 0.0% 1
1951 4 1 25.0% 2
1949 1 0 0.0% 1

Over 549 matches (Jul 1949 – Aug 2026), FK Eik Tønsberg drew 110 where the draw model expected 109.9 from those particular fixtures — about 0 more, or 0.0 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.

A flat league average would have expected 111.1 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.