What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 4 Nov 2026.
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEFA Europa League | 98 | 15 | 15.3% | 0 | 10 |
| UEFA Champions League | 26 | 2 | 7.7% | 0 | 4 |
| UEFA Cup Winners' Cup | 21 | 3 | 14.3% | 5 | 9 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 5 |
| 2018 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2016 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2015 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2013 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2011 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 7 |
| 2010 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 3 |
| 2009 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2008 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 3 |
| 2007 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2004 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1998 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 |
| 1997 | 8 | 1 | 12.5% | 4 |
| 1996 | 8 | 3 | 37.5% | 2 |
| 1995 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
| 1994 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1993 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1987 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 3 |
| 1982 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 |
| 1981 | 9 | 2 | 22.2% | 6 |
| 1980 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 3 |
| 1979 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1978 | 4 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 |
| 1977 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 4 |
| 1976 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 |
| 1973 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 4 |
| 1972 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 |
Over 145 matches (Jul 1972 – Oct 2019), Dinamo Tbilisi drew 20 where the draw model expected 33.2 from those particular fixtures — about 13 fewer, or 2.6 standard errors, more of a gap than most, though roughly one subject in twenty looks like this by chance.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 7 times running. A flat league average would have expected 31.7 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.