What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 12 Dec 2025 → 20 Mar 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 12 | 04 Dec 2002 → 08 Mar 2003 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 10 | 01 May 2022 → 04 Sep 2022 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 10 | 16 Jan 2021 → 20 Mar 2021 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 10 | 20 Mar 2009 → 22 May 2009 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 10 | 03 Feb 2006 → 07 Apr 2006 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 9 | 15 Feb 2008 → 11 Apr 2008 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 8 | 05 Mar 2023 → 30 Apr 2023 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 8 | 18 Aug 2017 → 14 Oct 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 7 | 14 May 2023 → 27 Aug 2023 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ligue 2 | 753 | 253 | 33.6% | 0 | 12 |
| Ligue 1 | 110 | 27 | 24.6% | 5 | 10 |
| Coupe de France | 20 | 6 | 30.0% | 0 | 3 |
| Club Friendlies | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30 | 12 | 40.0% | 11 |
| 2025 | 35 | 14 | 40.0% | 3 |
| 2024 | 36 | 12 | 33.3% | 5 |
| 2023 | 40 | 10 | 25.0% | 8 |
| 2022 | 37 | 8 | 21.6% | 10 |
| 2021 | 40 | 8 | 20.0% | 10 |
| 2020 | 26 | 8 | 30.8% | 5 |
| 2019 | 39 | 14 | 35.9% | 5 |
| 2018 | 38 | 15 | 39.5% | 5 |
| 2017 | 39 | 11 | 28.2% | 8 |
| 2016 | 39 | 10 | 25.6% | 5 |
| 2015 | 41 | 15 | 36.6% | 6 |
| 2014 | 39 | 14 | 35.9% | 5 |
| 2013 | 37 | 17 | 46.0% | 4 |
| 2012 | 40 | 16 | 40.0% | 5 |
| 2011 | 39 | 12 | 30.8% | 6 |
| 2010 | 38 | 12 | 31.6% | 6 |
| 2009 | 40 | 9 | 22.5% | 10 |
| 2008 | 39 | 13 | 33.3% | 9 |
| 2007 | 22 | 9 | 40.9% | 4 |
| 2006 | 19 | 3 | 15.8% | 10 |
| 2005 | 38 | 11 | 29.0% | 6 |
| 2004 | 38 | 18 | 47.4% | 4 |
| 2003 | 38 | 12 | 31.6% | 10 |
| 2002 | 19 | 4 | 21.1% | 7 |
Over 440 matches (Jan 2015 – Oct 2026), Clermont Foot drew 137 where the draw model expected 130.9 from those particular fixtures — about 6 more, or 0.6 standard errors, which is what the model expected, near enough.
A flat league average would have expected 131.4 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.