What this team's results have earned: every match in the database is replayed in date order, both sides start at 1500 and the winner takes points from the loser. The rating is the one it held after its last rated match, and the rank counts every club ever rated, sides that no longer play included. A measure of strength, not a forecast of the next result. Computed 3 Nov 2026.
| # | Run | From → To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 25 Oct 2025 → 11 Feb 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 2 | 10 | 24 Apr 2021 → 30 Aug 2021 | ▸ matches |
| 3 | 9 | 16 Sep 2026 → 31 Oct 2026 | ▸ matches |
| 4 | 9 | 02 Apr 2018 → 04 Aug 2018 | ▸ matches |
| 5 | 9 | 05 Apr 2016 → 09 Aug 2016 | ▸ matches |
| 6 | 8 | 09 Mar 2024 → 13 Apr 2024 | ▸ matches |
| 7 | 8 | 21 Mar 2017 → 29 Apr 2017 | ▸ matches |
| 8 | 7 | 21 Nov 2020 → 09 Jan 2021 | ▸ matches |
| 9 | 7 | 21 Sep 2019 → 26 Oct 2019 | ▸ matches |
| 10 | 7 | 13 Aug 2019 → 07 Sep 2019 | ▸ matches |
| Competition | P | D | Draw% | N | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National League | 462 | 142 | 30.7% | 9 | 15 |
| FA Cup | 39 | 10 | 25.6% | 3 | 5 |
| Club Friendlies | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 |
| Year | P | D | Draw% | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 40 | 6 | 15.0% | 9 |
| 2025 | 26 | 5 | 19.2% | 11 |
| 2024 | 21 | 7 | 33.3% | 8 |
| 2023 | 53 | 20 | 37.7% | 6 |
| 2022 | 54 | 16 | 29.6% | 6 |
| 2021 | 52 | 19 | 36.5% | 10 |
| 2020 | 24 | 8 | 33.3% | 5 |
| 2019 | 47 | 16 | 34.0% | 7 |
| 2018 | 50 | 15 | 30.0% | 9 |
| 2017 | 47 | 14 | 29.8% | 8 |
| 2016 | 50 | 15 | 30.0% | 9 |
| 2015 | 30 | 9 | 30.0% | 7 |
| 2013 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 1997 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 1 |
| 1996 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 2 |
| 1977 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 1 |
| 1973 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 |
Over 494 matches (Jul 2015 – Oct 2026), Boreham Wood drew 150 where the draw model expected 132.4 from those particular fixtures — about 18 more, or 1.8 standard errors, a gap most teams show over a stretch this long.
As unusual as a coin landing the same way 4 times running. A flat league average would have expected 124.5 instead — "more draws than the league" and "more draws than these fixtures deserved" are different claims. These matches were part of the model's own training set, so its chances were fitted already knowing the results.