Match ☆ 09 Dec 2026 · 20:00 UTC
ITL · UEFA Champions League · 2026 League phase
NED PSV Eindhoven
Current form · last 20
D D W L W L D W W W W D W L W L L W D W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#3 / 18 · NED · Eredivisie · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
–:–
Scheduled
ESP Atlético Madrid
Current form · last 20
W L W L L W W D W L L W W W W W W D W W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
#2 / 20 · ESP · La Liga · 2026/27
As of this morning · domestic league only
View head-to-head record →
The models forecast for this fixture
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure PSV Eindhoven Atlético Madrid
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 1 2
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 36 28
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.15 0.29
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 14.0% 14.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 16.0% 15.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 19.8% 23.3%
Draw scorethe predictor ranking score 0.075 0.106
Rankposition in that ranking 1,780 1,490
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 3
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.44
Σ Scorewhat the Cross predictor orders by 0.181
Team strength · Elo
PSV Eindhoven 1,969
Atlético Madrid 2,079
Rating gap -45 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 26.3% 25–49 · 73,123 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 2.22 – 1.39 home – away
Home win 55.8%
Draw 21.1% every level score added up
Away win 23.2%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 22.3% 75% goals model · 25% Elo gap
Goals model said 21.1% form only
This Elo gap said 26.3% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 20.8% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 20.8% – 20.8% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 22.3% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. This is a real forecast: the fixture had not been played when the model was fitted.

A forecast from every match played so far. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.