Match ☆ 18 Sep 2006
GER · 2. Bundesliga · 2006
HT 1–0
View head-to-head record →
Match stats
19 Shots 18
10 Shots on target 9
4 Corners 7
11 Fouls 20
0 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 1
Betting odds
1X2 (match) betting odds
Bet365 home win odds 2.25
Bet365 draw odds 3.25
Bet365 away win odds 2.7
Bet&Win home win odds 2.2
Bet&Win draw odds 3.2
Bet&Win away win odds 3
Gamebookers home win odds 2.25
Gamebookers draw odds 3.2
Gamebookers away win odds 2.9
Interwetten home win odds 2.2
Interwetten draw odds 3
Interwetten away win odds 2.9
Ladbrokes home win odds 2.25
Ladbrokes draw odds 3.2
Ladbrokes away win odds 2.75
Sportingbet home win odds 2.3
Sportingbet draw odds 3.2
Sportingbet away win odds 2.8
Stan James home win odds 2.1
Stan James draw odds 3.1
Stan James away win odds 3.2
VC Bet home win odds 2.25
VC Bet draw odds 3.1
VC Bet away win odds 2.8
William Hill home win odds 2.35
William Hill draw odds 3.15
William Hill away win odds 2.6
Number of Betbrain bookmakers (1X2 odds) 34
Betbrain maximum home win odds 2.3
Betbrain maximum draw odds 3.3
Betbrain maximum away win odds 3.25
Betbrain average home win odds 2.2
Betbrain average draw odds 3.2
Betbrain average away win odds 2.99
Total goals (over/under) betting odds
Number of Betbrain bookmakers (over/under 2.5 goals) 25
Betbrain maximum over 2.5 goals 2.03
Betbrain maximum under 2.5 goals 1.91
Betbrain average over 2.5 goals 1.9
Betbrain average under 2.5 goals 1.82
Asian handicap betting odds
Number of Betbrain bookmakers (Asian handicap) 12
Betbrain Asian handicap size (home team) 0
Betbrain maximum Asian handicap home odds 1.69
Betbrain average Asian handicap home odds 1.62
Betbrain maximum Asian handicap away odds 2.2
Betbrain average Asian handicap away odds 2.15
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Hansa Rostock 1. FC Kaiserslautern
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 3 4
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 20 27
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.53 0.83
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 14.0% 22.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 20.0% 20.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 24.2% 22.2%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 7
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 1.36

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 18 Sep 2006, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
Hansa Rostock 1,546 after: 1,563
1. FC Kaiserslautern 1,655 after: 1,638
Rating gap -44 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 26.3% 25–49 · 72,953 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.69 – 1.15 home – away
Home win 49.4%
Draw 25.2% every level score added up
Away win 25.4%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 25.5% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 25.2% form only
This Elo gap said 26.3% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 28.1% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 28.1% – 28.2% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 25.5% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. Unlike the two readings above it, this one is not leak-free: the model was fitted on all of history, this match included, so for a played match it is a description rather than a prediction.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.