Match ☆ 16 Jan 2000
Unknown competition
CHN China PR
Current form · last 20
L L L L W W L L L L W D W L W D W L L L
Latest results · oldest first
1–0
FT · Home win
URU Uruguay
Current form · last 20
D W D L D L W W D W W D L D D D D L W W
Latest results · oldest first
View head-to-head record →
The models what they said before kick-off
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure China PR Uruguay
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 1 2
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 25 9
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.22 0.49
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 22.0% 22.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 22.0% 26.0%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 18.6% 22.9%
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 3
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.71

These are the figures that held before kick-off: each side's record over every match it had played before 16 Jan 2000, computed exactly as the predictor computes today's. Draw score and rank are left out: both place a team against the whole field, and the field can only be scored as it stands now.

Team strength · Elo
China PR 1,579
Uruguay 1,909
Rating gap -270 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 19.9% 200–299 · 8,432 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 2.43 – 0.53 home – away
Home win 79.1%
Draw 15.0% every level score added up
Away win 5.9%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 16.1% 75% goals model · 25% Elo gap
Goals model said 15.0% form only
This Elo gap said 19.9% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

Both figures are what the models knew before this match — neither ever reads the result it is describing, so they can be compared with what actually happened. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.