Match ☆ 15 Nov 2026 · 13:00 UTC
FRA · Coupe de France · 2026
FRA Stade Malherbe Caen
Current form · last 20
L L L L L L L L D W L L L D D L L D L W
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
Current league standing unavailable
As of this morning · domestic league only
–:–
Scheduled
FRA Chambly
Current form · last 20
D W L L L L D L L W D L W L D W W L D L
Latest results · oldest first
Current league place
Current league standing unavailable
As of this morning · domestic league only
View head-to-head record →
The models forecast for this fixture
Draw predictor · this site's own figures
Figure Stade Malherbe Caen Chambly
N — no-draw runmatches in a row without a draw 1 1
Max Nthis team's longest run ever 14 7
E — draw debtexpected draws over the current run 0.20 0.28
p50 — last 50draw rate over its last 50 matches 16.0% 30.0%
p100 — last 100draw rate over its last 100 matches 22.0% 27.4%
Draw % — all timeshare of every match drawn 28.9% 27.4%
Draw scorethe predictor ranking score 0.109 0.170
Rankposition in that ranking 1,465 937
Σ Nboth sides' runs added 2
Σ Eboth sides' draw debt added 0.48
Σ Scorewhat the Cross predictor orders by 0.279
Team strength · Elo
Stade Malherbe Caen 1,466
Chambly 1,489
Rating gap +42 home advantage included
Draws at this gap 26.3% 25–49 · 73,133 matches
Goals model · Dixon-Coles
Expected goals 1.20 – 1.63 home – away
Home win 27.6%
Draw 25.6% every level score added up
Away win 46.8%
Both together · the blend
Blended draw chance 25.8% 70% goals model · 30% Elo gap
Goals model said 25.6% form only
This Elo gap said 26.3% strength only

The mix is the one that scored best over 544,576 matches — the two are averaged on the log-odds scale, not simply added.

The regression · the logistic model
Logistic draw chance 22.9% five signals, then recalibrated
95% band 22.4% – 22.9% how unsure the fit is, not the match
The blend says 25.8% the older published reading

A regression over five signals — the goals model, the draw rate at this Elo gap, the expected goals in the fixture and the competition's own base draw rate — with an isotonic map on top to put the level back where reality is. Held out on a decade it never saw it beat the blend above, which is why both are shown here while one is chosen. This is a real forecast: the fixture had not been played when the model was fitted.

A forecast from every match played so far. Measured over 160,869 priced matches the goals model is slightly worse than the bookmakers (how it is scored), so a high draw chance means an even, low-scoring match rather than value. Descriptive statistics, not betting advice.